Thursday, April 1, 2010
Chief Seattle's Letter
Thursday, March 25, 2010
The Easy Keeper
In a recent Kit Pharo newsletter, there was an engaging discussion on the relevance of feedlot feed efficiency for cow-calf producers who rely on grass. The general consensus was that feedlot feed efficiency did not have much relevance, and actually may negatively impact the cow-calf producer. Rather than feed efficiency, the discussion included descriptors such as ‘easy-fleshing’, ‘easy keeping’, and ‘low-energy maintenance requirements’ as cattle traits that will increase the net profit for cow-calf producers.
General I agree with the above assessment for cow-calf producers. However, for the grass-finisher and the grazing dairy, I think the discussion becomes more complicated. Animals need both increased feed efficiency to increase production (Average Daily Gain, or milk production), and also easy keeper traits ensuring that animals have low-energy maintenance requirements. I do think the latter trait is the number one trait for all grazers, regardless of production type. Low-energy maintenance requirements ensure the grazing animal’s ability to thrive through the constantly varying conditions of pastures. This trait also guarantees the animal will not spend the day grazing just to maintain body condition, but can spend more time allocating nutrients for producing the product that will put money in our pockets.
I would be more comfortable aligning myself with the cattle industry (dairy and beef), if the industry would put low-energy maintenance requirement traits ahead of selecting for high production and feed efficiency traits. Cheap grain prices have largely been blamed for driving the emphasis on high production. However, as the discussion in Kit Pharo’s newsletter eludes to, buying into the high efficiency, high production traits is more likely to put money into the pockets of the agricultural industry’s pockets and not into the individual producer’s pocket. The conventional ag industry has not promoted ‘easy keeper’ traits, because these traits put money primarily in the pockets of the producer.
All too often farmers and ranchers primary source of information for making management decisions are the seed salesman, the semen salesman, and the feed salesman. The companies these salesmen represent are primarily seeking to line their pockets at the expense of the farmer. As Ian Mitchell-Inns (Savory Center – Holistic Management) concluded in Kit Pharo’s discussion, “You and only you are responsible and accountable for your decisions! If you allow others (feeder, packer, feed salesman, etc.) to make your decisions for you, do not think that they are not going to help themselves to all they can get! That’s human nature.
Monday, February 22, 2010
At the recent annual Kansas Grazers Association winter conference, Kit Pharo was the keynote speaker. Pharo is an eastern Colorado cattle rancher who has been instrumental in advancing the grass-based cattle industry. Pharo Cattle Company (www.pharocattle.com) primarily sells bulls and semen with appropriate grass-based genetics. Pharo challenges livestock producers to think outside the box and to not get caught up in the production driven paradigm of conventional agriculture. Below are some quotes and concepts from Pharo:
· “It’s not nice or profitable to fool Mother Nature.” Pharo was referring to the need to calve in sync with nature (calve when wild animals would naturally have babies); however, I think this statement has a much broader application to agriculture. Anytime we develop technologies or practices that are in direct conflict with natural ecosystems (monocultures, GMOs, pesticides, feeding grain to ruminants in feedlots, reliance on fossil fuels, etc.), there are a whole host of long- and short-term unintended consequences that may not be the best economic decision for individual farmers or society in general.
· “Dare to be a herd quitter.” We must break away from the status quo mentality. Doing what everybody else is doing is poor business practice.
· “The commodity business is a breakeven business.” If we remove ourselves from this business, we no longer are selling commodities, but products. By selling products, we have more control and are insulating ourselves against price fluctuations.
· “Profitable ranching = the most efficient use of forage resources.”
· To increase profit for commodities either increase production or reduce expenses.
· Management Decisions can be either production driven or profit driven, and these are not necessarily the same thing!
· “Sustainability = Profitability + Enjoyability”
· Grass-based livestock producers are in the business of “converting free solar energy into a high quality food product.”
Wes Jackson Reflections
· So far, the sustainable agriculture movement has focused on produce, which makes up only 7% of agricultural movement. Grain and meat production need to be captured by the sustainable agriculture movement.
· “High energy destroys public knowledge of the biological and cultural variety.” Our dependence on fossil fuels has greatly reduced our reliance and knowledge of our cultural and biological capital, much to the detriment of ourselves and our environment.
· Jackson called capitalism “petri dish economics.” Capitalism (and the discoveries of fossil fuels) has lead to a rapid population explosion and rapid exploitation of all available natural resources.
· We are in the wrong paradigm: We have been trying to solve problems on the molecular level (GMO), but should be solving problems on the ecological level (perennial grains).
· We need to rebuild agriculture on natural ecosystems
· Continuity is better than ingenuity (referring to building agriculture on an ecological versus a molecular level).